2nd District Court of Appeal Rejects Defense Request for Juror Interview in Florida DUI Case

2nd District Court Of Appeal Rejects Defense Request For Juror Interview In Florida DUI Case

The district court heldthat the defendant'sallegations were too ...More
The district court heldthat the defendant'sallegations were toospeculative to allow ajuror interview. Thedistrict court of appealheld that defendant's didnot allege factsnecessary support hissupposition that a jurorhad somehow ascertainedthe expiration date forthe blood kit, and thedefendant also did notallege that there was, infact, an expiration datevisible on the kit. Less

2nd District Court of Appeal Rejects Defense Request for Juror Interview in Florida DUI Case

to get instant updates about '2nd District Court Of Appeal Rejects Defense Request For Juror Interview In Florida DUI Case' on your MyPage. Meet other similar minded people. Its Free!

X 

All Updates


Overview:
The district court held that defendant's allegations were too speculative to permit a juror interview. The district court held that the defendant's didn't allege facts necessary support his supposition that a juror had somehow ascertained the expiration date for the blood draw kit, and defendant also failed to allege that there was, in fact, an expiration date visible on the kit.
Description:

In the case of State versus. Monserrate-Jacobs, the 5th District Court of Appeal held as follows:

The district court of appeal granted the state's petition for certiorari review regarding a post-trial juror interview. Defendant was charged with DUI-Manslaughter. The State of Florida presented evidence that blood samples that were taken from the defendant on the night in question reflected that defendant had a .178 blood alcohol level. The blood draw kit utilized, as well as the vials of the defendant's blood, were admitted into evidence. The defendant conjectured the blood draw must somehow have been contaminated either through defective outdated tubes and/or an expired blood kit. The jury asked to examine the blood draw kit during deliberations, in front of the defendant's counsel; no objections were raised. Following the guilty verdict, defendant filed a motion for juror interview, based on his belief that a particular juror had observed an expiration date on the blood kit and informed the other jurors of her observations. The district court held that the defendant's allegations were too speculative to permit a juror interview. The 2nd District Court of Appeal held that defendant's did not allege facts necessary support his supposition that a juror had somehow ascertained the expiration date for the blood kit, and the defendant also did not allege that there was, in fact, an expiration date visible on the kit.

This case summary is provided to you by DUI Attorneys Michael Dye & Daniel Rosenberg. For more information, please contact Mr. Dye & Mr. Rosenberg at (305)459-6286 OR visit the firm website by clicking here: Firm Website.

No feeds found

All
Posting your question. Please wait!...


About

The district court held that the defendant's allegations were too speculative to allow a juror interview. The district court of appeal held that defendant's did not allege facts necessary support his supposition that a juror had somehow ascertained the expiration date for the blood kit, and the defendant also did not allege that there was, in fact, an expiration date visible on the kit.
No messages found
Suggested Pages
Tell your friends >
about this page
 Create a new Page
for companies, colleges, celebrities or anything you like.Get updates on MyPage.
Create a new Page
 Find your friends
  Find friends on MyPage from