In
Indo-European linguistics, the term
Indo-Hittite (also
Indo-Anatolian) refers to
Sturtevant's 1926 hypothesis that the
Anatolian languages may have split off the
Proto-Indo-European language considerably earlier than the separation of the remaining
Indo-European languages. The term is somewhat imprecise, as the prefix
Indo- does not refer to the
Indo-Aryan branch in particular, but is iconic for
Indo-European, and the
-Hittite part refers to the Anatolian language family as a whole.
Proponents of the Indo-Hittite hypothesis claim the separation may have preceded the spread of the remaining branches by several millennia, possibly as early as 7000 BC. In this context, the
proto-language before the split of Anatolian would be called
Proto-Indo-Hittite, and the proto-language of the remaining branches, before the next split, presumably of
Tocharian, would be called
Proto-Indo-European (PIE). This is a matter of terminology, though, as the hypothesis does not dispute the ultimate genetic relation of Anatolian with Indo-European, it just means to emphasize the assumed magnitude of temporal separation.
Linguistics
Traditionally there has been a strong notion among Indo-European linguistics that the Anatolian branch was separated earlier than other branches. Within the
Kurgan framework the split time is estimated at roughly 4000 BC.
Some fundamental shared features, such as the
aorist category of the verb (which denotes action without reference to duration or completion), with...
Read More