McGhee v National Coal Board

McGhee V National Coal Board

McGhee v National Coal Board

to get instant updates about 'McGhee V National Coal Board' on your MyPage. Meet other similar minded people. Its Free!


All Updates

McGhee v National Coal Board, 3 All E.R. 1008, 1 W.L.R. 1, is a leading tort case decided by the House of Lords. The Lords held that where a breach of duty has a material effect on the likelihood of injury then the subsequent injury will be said to have been caused by the breach.


James McGhee was employed to clean out brick kilns and developed dermatitis from the accumulation of coal dust on his skin. Because there were no shower facilities at his workplace, he would cycle home each day, increasing the risk he would contract dermatitis. Had his employer provided shower facilities, the coal dust been washed off before cycling, reducing the risk of contracting dermatitis. Due to the limits of scientific knowledge, it was impossible to rule out the possibility that he hadn't contracted dermatitis during the non-wrongful exposure to brick dust while working in the kiln.

He sued his employer for negligence for breaching its duty to provide proper washing facilities. The issue before the House of Lords was whether the failure to provide the washing facilities had caused the rash.


The House of Lords held that the risk of harm had been materially increased by the prolonged exposure to the dust. Lord Reid stated:<blockquote>"The medical evidence is to the effect that the fact that the man had to cycle home caked with grime and sweat added materially to the risk"</blockquote>The material increase in risk was treated as equivalent to a material...
Read More

No feeds found

wait Posting your question. Please wait!...

No updates available.
No messages found
Tell your friends >
about this page
 Create a new Page
for companies, colleges, celebrities or anything you like.Get updates on MyPage.
Create a new Page
 Find your friends
  Find friends on MyPage from