Morgan v Odhams Press Ltd

Morgan V Odhams Press Ltd

Court Case
Court Case Less

Morgan v Odhams Press Ltd

to get instant updates about 'Morgan V Odhams Press Ltd' on your MyPage. Meet other similar minded people. Its Free!


All Updates

The case of Morgan v Odhams Press Ltd clarified the law in England regarding identification of the plaintiff in an action for defamation.


A newspaper article in The Sun (then owned by Odhams Press) reported on the kidnapping of a young woman by a dog-doping gang. The woman had been staying at the home of Mr. Morgan, a journalist, at the time of her kidnap.

Morgan claimed that even though the article did not mention him in any way, it implied to those who knew that the woman was staying with him that he was a member of the gang.


Lord Morris of Borth-y-gest ruled that even though the plaintiff was never referred to by name, nor was he even directly implicated upon strict reading of the defamatory article, he was still sufficiently identified. This was because a substantial group of people who knew the plaintiff understood that it referred to him. Lord Morris held that this was sufficient, even though no-one called to give evidence in fact believed the allegations to be true.


Read More

No feeds found

wait Posting your question. Please wait!...


Court Case
No messages found
Tell your friends >
about this page
 Create a new Page
for companies, colleges, celebrities or anything you like.Get updates on MyPage.
Create a new Page
 Find your friends
  Find friends on MyPage from