Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital

Schloendorff V. Society Of New York Hospital

Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital

to get instant updates about 'Schloendorff V. Society Of New York Hospital' on your MyPage. Meet other similar minded people. Its Free!

X 

All Updates


Description:
Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, 211 N.Y. 125, 105 N.E. 92 , was a decision issued by the New York Court of Appeals in 1914 which established principles of informed consent and respondeat superior in United States law.

Facts

The plaintiff, Mary Schloendorff, was admitted to New York Hospital and consented to being examined under ether to determine if a diagnosed fibroid tumor was malignant, but withheld consent for removal of the tumor. The physician examined the tumor, found it malignant, and then disregarded Schloendorff's wishes and removed the tumor.

Judgment

The Court found that the operation to which the plaintiff did not consent constituted medical battery. Justice Benjamin Cardozo wrote in the Court's opinion:



Schloendorff, however, had sued the hospital itself, not the physicians. For this reason, the Court found that a non-profit hospital could not be held liable for the actions of its employees.

Significance

The idea that a non-profit hospital could not be sued for actions of its employees became a principle that became known as the "Schloendorff rule." The Court would later reject the "Schloendorff rule" in the 1957 decision of Bing v. Thunig.

See also



External links








Read More

No feeds found

All
Posting your question. Please wait!...


No updates available.
No messages found
Suggested Pages
Tell your friends >
about this page
 Create a new Page
for companies, colleges, celebrities or anything you like.Get updates on MyPage.
Create a new Page
 Find your friends
  Find friends on MyPage from